<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>flow&#039;s blog &#187; chello</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flowww.at/tag/chello/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flowww.at</link>
	<description>blog.flowww.at</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chello vs. BlizzNet</title>
		<link>http://blog.flowww.at/2009/10/chello-vs-blizznet/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.flowww.at/2009/10/chello-vs-blizznet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blizznet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chello]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flowww.at/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ich steige gerade von Chello Classic (UPC) auf BlizzNet:flat_XL (Teletronic) um. Bis zum Ende diesen Monats sind beide Anschlüsse aktiv; also die beste Voraussetzung um einen ausführlichen Vergleich zu machen! Vergleicht man die Eckdaten (Stand: Oktober 2009)&#8230; Produkt Chello Classic BlizzNet (flat_XL) Provider &#8230; <a href="http://blog.flowww.at/2009/10/chello-vs-blizznet/" class="more-link">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.flowww.at/2009/10/chello-vs-blizznet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

